It got off to one of the most promising starts I’ve ever read in fantasy literature. But just as the plot’s mystery was about to hit a nail biting crescendo, A Discovery of Witches jumped (of its own volition) into a dark, swirling vortex of ‘Does my jugular look juicy in this?’
It’s no secret that I’m attracted to fantasy and magic. So much so that I will pick up any title with a promise of witchy wonder. I would even ignore my own partner’s review of the same book – ok, I didn’t read it, but that’s only because I couldn’t take my eyes off the title – to give my imagination some exercise.
I devoured the first quarter of the book with such hunger I actually forgot to sleep. I sat up at night making notes about how interesting it is that a contemporary book merges magic, science and academia. I absolutely loved the descriptions of alchemy in the research of our protagonist, a highly decorated historian and non-practicing witch, Diana Bishop. I also didn’t mind Mathew Clairmont, a seriously accomplished scientist and vampire whose current passion -- he’s had many over his lifespan of 1500 years -- is genetics and mutation.
Set in the academic city of Oxford, England the writing is powerful enough to exude the smell of old parchment, rare books and ancient libraries. Our story begins instantly as Diana starts to hear whispers when she calls up Ashmole 782, a manuscript she wants to refer to for a research paper in alchemy. She opens it to discover that it’s actually a palimpsest, a book from which its old text has been washed away, or hidden in this case by magic and covered with new text. All she needs to do is touch its pages and it will reveal to her its secrets. But as one who has turned her back on witchcraft, she tells herself that she isn’t interested. Also, as a historian, it would be sacrilege to touch so old a scroll lest its pages crumble.
She sends the book back without further delay but soon realises that it is an elusive scripture bearing the secrets of how and why vampires, witches and daemons exist. The sudden arrival of hoards of creatures in Oxford within close proximity to her serves as an indication that the book is very much sought after. But, as these things go, it is only Diana who can summon the book because turns out it was bewitched centuries ago to stay hidden, and as one who doesn’t (know how to) practice magic, she is clueless as to how she's meant to break the spell.
Enter our vampire love interest Mathew who initially wants the book for his own research on genetics and mutation – specifically, those of the first vampires – and finds himself falling in love with her. In typical vampire style, he takes it upon himself to protect her from other creatures, including fellow witches who are out for blood. She resists, but the frequency at which she is threatened soon convinces her to take his help and eventually fall head over heels in love with him.
The book has the ‘X’ factor which made The Da Vinci Code such a raging success. It has the elements of magic – in an adult capacity of course-- that turned Harry Potter into one of the most beloved fantasy series’ of our generation. It also has poetry in its use of words and back stories that makes certain moments so much more powerful. But most importantly it has magic in its writing as it paints vivid scenes of dark holes with shimmery ghosts and smoke creatures crawling out of bowls.
Where it fails is in its similarities to Twilight and The Vampire Diaries -- not in its adaptation (or lack thereof) of vampire lore but in the nature of the vampire's relationship with the mortal. Harkness spends too much time trying to paint a stupid love story that really could have done with fewer words. At the highest point of its mystery and intrigue, Diana receives a photo of her parents mangled bodies from the time when they were murdered years ago. Next thing we know, she’s been whisked off to Mathew’s castle in Sept Tours, France where they spend what seems like a large portion of the book discovering everything it would seem, except witches.
“You think this one's bad?” Reshma asked me last night. “You should read the sequels in the All Soul's Trilogy.”
“No thank you,” I snapped. "I’d much rather take a stake to the heart."
But seriously, if you dream of the day you will finally find the perfect man to bite your neck, buy A Discovery of Witches from Flipkart here.
Touch books, feel books, smell books, borrow books, read books, review books, e-books, need books,love books,breathe books.
Showing posts with label The Vampire Diaries. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Vampire Diaries. Show all posts
Thursday, August 8, 2013
Friday, March 16, 2012
Review | Interview with the Vampire by Anne Rice
If you’re well versed in contemporary vampire fiction (read tv shows and movies) Interview With The Vampire by Anne Rice is bound to grate on your nerves.
“How can Louis possibly not know how to kill a vampire?” He must be stupid.
“Why is he so easy to overpower – physically and psychologically?” What a f^#king p#*sy!!!
What is Lestat’s deal, really, what is it? He’s a mad man of leisure.
And for the first 150 pages of the book – where are the other vampires in the story? The originals? The hunters? The shiny ones?
![]() |
| Tom Cruise as Lestat |
It couldn’t be more obvious that Interview with the Vampire, now a seriously popular movie starring Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise, is a bridge between the commercial vampire fiction of Bram Stoker’s Dracula and LJ Smith’s The Vampire Diaries. Lois, the heir to Point Du Lac in New Orleans reveals in a book-long interview to a character known only as “the boy” that he was turned in the 1700s by a vampire called Lestat who wanted access to his fortune. For some reason that isn’t quite apparent, our lovely Lois does so, despite being at the point of suicide at the time, and also comes into the latter’s control for the next couple of years. They find Claudia, a young orphan whom they turn and take in as their daughter. And if the homoerotic undercurrents aren’t strong enough, the Freudian one’s do come into force when Claudia, upon turning into a woman in a child’s body, attempts to murder Lestat (guess he was the mother in the relationship), which goes awry. You see, Lestat’s ploy to exert his power wholly upon the two comprised of his never telling them the essentials of things they need to know such as – how he turned them, how immortal vampires could be killed and other gifts they might have as prisoners of the night.
![]() |
| Kirsten Dunst as Claudia |
So yes, it does break convention from myths, hints of which were presented in Dracula with the garlic and the crucifix, both of which our trio isn’t affected. But it doesn’t stray into the more fascinating vampire lore like The Vampire Diaries which presents an array of theories, two of the most interesting ones find them compelling their victims and the healing power of their blood. But what it lacks in these areas, it makes up in its psychological analyses of human nature extended into the world of the undead.
![]() |
| Claudia and Louis, played by Brad Pitt |
Louis would much rather live on animal blood than kill people because 100 years on he still finds it morally complex to end a human life. Claudia is influenced in equal measure by her polar opposite “fathers”, kind and cultured Louis and the dark and inhuman Lestat. The child vamp imbibes characteristics of them both depending on whom she’s manipulating that day. To Louis’ disadvantage, disdain and discredit, these tactics are always played out on him. There’s always a shudder to be felt when you see him getting pushed around, used for his fortune and pretty much beaten to the ground even after he’s rid of Lestat.
For those of us entranced by vampire fiction – by which I mean not in possession of a handbag that reads “I (heart) Edward Cullen” and the like – Anne Rice’s Interview with the Vampire is an important read to understand the progression of genre from the dark ages of monsters and bats to the pretty boys making for bubblegum romance on television. Be warned though, it dark, deep and gritty. You may never be able to look at a rat on shore or ship without picturing Lestat piercing its body and pouring its blood into a glass of wine. Or for that matter looking at a glass of wine and … you get the picture.
Buy Interview with the Vampire by Anne Rice from Flipkart (India only) and Amazon.com (US).
Like The Caterpillar Cafe on Facebook
Like The Caterpillar Cafe on Facebook
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




